“Music Nets Millions for Liberty Loan Drive,” proclaimed a front-page headline in October 1918. A major gala at the Metropolitan Opera had just raised more than $20 million for that World War I bond campaign. The New York Philharmonic had raised another million in its own patriotic concert, with George M. Cohan leading his hit “Over There.”
But further down the page in Musical Courier magazine were bleaker notices: National tours of the Chicago Opera Association and the Paris Conservatory’s orchestra had been put on hold because of quarantines in East Coast and Midwestern cities, a response to the influenza outbreak then sweeping the world.
“One thing can be said for the influenza,” Musical America magazine noted a few months later. “It has taken away the certainty from symphony concerts, with the result that one never knows on starting forth these days whether it will be the soloist, the conductor or the entire personnel of the orchestra that will be unable to appear. The only sure thing is that someone will be ill.”
Millions of Americans were sickened and 675,000 died in the 1918 pandemic, among at least 50 million deaths worldwide. And yet, perhaps surprisingly, the effects on musical culture in the United States ended up being relatively mild: merely a few weeks of delayed and canceled concerts.
The flu did not transform the American cultural scene, as the new coronavirus threatens to; when the outbreak eased, in 1919, musical life returned swiftly to normal. A columnist in Musical America back then estimated that the financial damage to music from the influenza outbreak amounted to around $5 million nationwide, the equivalent of approximately $85.5 million today. In 2020, the Met alone stands to lose that much, or more, if the coronavirus outbreak keeps it closed into the fall.
The pandemic was seen “more as a temporary inconvenience than anything else,” E. Douglas Bomberger, the musicologist and author of “Making Music American: 1917 and the Transformation of Culture,” said in an interview. “The war was the major thing.”
“Influenza Closes Many Concert Halls” was a typical headline in October 1918. It was the beginning of the cultural season, and major ensembles such as the Philadelphia Orchestra suspended their opening weekends. For the most part, though, the classical industry remained sunny about its prospects; an impresario told Musical America that it was “always a good season for a good attraction, so we are not worried.” The Cincinnati Symphony Orchestra held rehearsals in a nearby village to circumvent the ban on gatherings in its home city.
In New York, which did not close theaters or halls, concert life mostly continued apace. “The huge reaches of Carnegie Hall,” read one description of a piano recital, “held an audience which seemed to know neither the lure of the Liberty Loan doings outside or the fear of Spanish influenza among the throng inside.”
But some patrons expressed caution; a symphony concert for children was called off at the request of subscribers. The Met delayed several productions because of the illnesses of some principal singers. The eminent violinist Jascha Heifetz and the pianist Leo Ornstein backed out of performances because they were both stricken with the flu.
And serious havoc was played on touring orchestras and opera companies. The orchestra of the Paris Conservatory had traveled to the United States by warship for a 60-city tour and made a splashy Carnegie Hall debut in mid-October. But as the flu spread, the ensemble’s plans were scrambled. “So strict is the quarantine throughout the United States,” Musical Courier reported, “that the management reports that not one single date will be played as originally scheduled, so the orchestra will be obliged to remain in New York until conditions permit it to move.”
The pandemic’s effects on pop music are less well documented, though Mr. Bomberger found records of early jazz bands having tours canceled. When New Orleans shut down, Louis Armstrong, then 17, apparently took gigs playing country dances outside of town. Several different songs called “The Influenza Blues” were published as sheet music.
Capitalizing on a potential trend toward listening at home, the nascent record industry marketed Edison phonographs with advertisements that declared, “You can attend concerts of grand opera, light opera, sacred music or the fine old songs without running any risk of contracting influenza.” And magazines circulated pictures of the famed pianist Leopold Godowsky in a protective mask at his home near San Francisco.
“Like a good citizen, he wears his mask,” stated one caption, “and, like the rest of the community, thinks it quite likely he’ll be lonely without it when the quarantine has passed.”
Such photo-ops were typical of an era in which music was mobilized for wartime propaganda, and artists molded into symbols of heroic self-sacrifice. Earlier in 1918, Musical America had called the soprano Geraldine Farrar the “high priestess of patriotism,” with photos of her sewing bandages and hawking war bonds.
It seems likely that wartime fund-raising concerts, including that Met gala, helped spread the disease. Philadelphia infamously refused to call off a huge Liberty Loan parade, and many cities continued to hold open-air pageants.
“They seem to have had a mistaken impression that doing concerts outdoors was not a problem, because the germs wouldn’t be communicated as easily,” Mr. Bomberger said. “But when you see these crowds of tens of thousands of people, packed in like sardines, you know that they were passing the germs around.”
Some of the obituaries in the musical press were wrenching. In early October 1918, the young soprano Belle Godschalk, who had just started her international career when war broke out, died of influenza. Along with volunteering to work at the Bethlehem Steel plant in Pennsylvania, she had toured troop encampments, and contracted the illness after singing seven times in a single day at Camp Dix, in New Jersey.
“The frail body burnt itself out working with feverish enthusiasm in the munition plant, and then singing for the boys in the camps,” a local conductor wrote in the Musical Courier. “She literally gave up her life for her country.”
Even if they survived, musicians lost significant income; in San Francisco, the musicians’ union fought to rescind a monthlong theater ban. But by November, the East Coast and Midwest had begun to reopen as new cases declined, and concert halls were more packed than ever. The Chicago Symphony Orchestra resumed its season, albeit with “threat of pains and penalties for the patron who should cough or sneeze without smothering the explosion in a handkerchief,” according to Musical America. Touring opera companies that resumed their seasons apparently saw extraordinary ticket sales.
What made the 1918 flu so lethal also made its impact on the arts less dire: It moved with stunning swiftness. The pandemic was ultimately a horrific blip in musical history. It is not clear if any cultural institutions faced the kind of long-term financial consequences that are being predicted today.
And live performance was already being challenged in the 21st century, even before the coronavirus. With the multitude of streaming options available, many people may remain at home even when it is safe to return to theaters and concert halls.
“In that time, they hadn’t even instituted commercial radio yet, let alone television or the internet, and the phonograph industry was still in its infancy,” Mr. Bomberger said of 1918. “Truly, there wasn’t an alternative to live concerts. People knew that after this was over, they would get back to live concerts full blast.”
In November 1919, Musical America predicted that the new concert season would be “of record-breaking proportions,” with increased audiences both because the war was over and “to compensate for schedules blasted to nothingness a year ago by the influenza ravages.”
“Musical interest everywhere,” it added, “appears to be at a fever heat.” The pages that followed detailed a rich array of upcoming performances, from band concerts in Mankato, Minn., to the opening of a new opera house in Bangor, Maine.
“The thing that was really heartening to me to read in these 1918 sources,” Mr. Bomberger said, “is how much people appreciated music, and needed music, and loved music. It was something that they couldn’t live without.”
"impact" - Google News
May 06, 2020 at 04:17PM
https://ift.tt/3bcBy78
The 1918 Pandemic’s Impact on Music? Surprisingly Little - The New York Times
"impact" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2RIFll8
Shoes Man Tutorial
Pos News Update
Meme Update
Korean Entertainment News
Japan News Update
Bagikan Berita Ini
0 Response to "The 1918 Pandemic’s Impact on Music? Surprisingly Little - The New York Times"
Post a Comment